I, too, would prefer to see the process immediately flag affect renewals.
-Eric
-------------------------------------------------------
arctic bears - the internet - your way.
50000 domain names were reserved today. was yours?
domains from US$25/year, name resolution, mail hosting.
http://www.arcticbears.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "WebWiz" <webwiz@atlcon.net>
To: <dev-list@opensrs.org>
Cc: "Scott Allan" <sallan@opensrs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: renewals
> >> I would have expected similar
> >> behavior as for orders - if you don't process orders immediately, why
> >> process renewals immediately?
> >
> > A good question - if there was a lot of demand for this, we could
> > look at building it in.
> >
> > Regards,
> > sA
>
> Consider this my vote toward "a lot of demand for this". I'd prefer to
see
> the "process immediately" flag honored for renewals as well as orders.
>
> Regards,
> Eric Longman
> Atl-Connect Internet Services
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------+
> | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net |
> | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 |
> | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 support@atlcon.net |
> +-------------------------------------------------------+
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Allan" <sallan@opensrs.org>
> To: "Chuck Hatcher" <chatcher@ashland-ky.net>
> Cc: "Ken" <ka@pacific.net>; <dev-list@opensrs.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:54 PM
> Subject: Re: renewals
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Chuck Hatcher wrote:
>
> > I was just about to ask the same type of question. Does renew.cgi only
> work
> > for domains associated with the RSP's account?
>
> No - it works on any OSRS domain.
>
> > I just did a renewal just to see if renewals were affected by the
"Process
> > Orders Immediately" flag - they are not. I would have expected similar
> > behavior as for orders - if you don't process orders immediately, why
> > process renewals immediately?
>
> A good question - if there was a lot of demand for this, we could look at
> building it in.
>
> Regards,
>
> sA
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:12 EDT