Re: SHPL: BILLING S/W FOR OPENSRS REGISTRATIONS

From: Michael Brunson (brunson@intercosmos.com)
Date: Fri Feb 16 2001 - 12:24:06 EST

Next message: bill@daze.net: "Re: Search Renewals in System?"
Previous message: Scott Allan: "Re: Search Renewals in System?"
In reply to: Charles Daminato: "Re: SHPL: BILLING S/W FOR OPENSRS REGISTRATIONS"
Next in thread: Dave Warren: "Re: SHPL: BILLING S/W FOR OPENSRS REGISTRATIONS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:54:25 -0500 (EST), Charles
Daminato <chuck@tucows.com> wrote:

>There's nothing wrong with placing your own systems between your customers
>and OpenSRS - it ensures you keep your customers, and they don't jump ship
>before paying for the services you're getting. I know of several RSPs
>doing this already :)
>
>Charles Daminato
>TUCOWS Product Manager (ccTLDs)
>chuck@tucows.com

And I'm sure there is nothing to it! :-)
Definitely the way to go.

--
Michael Brunson                          504.473.6643
brunson@intercosmos.com                 ICQ: 83163789
     <? Special Projects Programming Manager ?>
      ---   Intercosmos Media Group, Inc.  ---
      www.intercosmos.com    www.directnic.com

Next message: bill@daze.net: "Re: Search Renewals in System?"
Previous message: Scott Allan: "Re: Search Renewals in System?"
In reply to: Charles Daminato: "Re: SHPL: BILLING S/W FOR OPENSRS REGISTRATIONS"
Next in thread: Dave Warren: "Re: SHPL: BILLING S/W FOR OPENSRS REGISTRATIONS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:15 EDT