RE: OpenSRS-SF

From: Bryan Waters (bryanw@abwaters.com)
Date: Thu Nov 15 2001 - 14:23:55 EST


I saw that coming... ;) Actually, I am in the process of porting everything
to PHP on linux but all things take time and I was interested in upgrading
before I finished my port. Mostly backend database work...

-bryanw
HalfPriceNames Domain Registry
http://www.halfpricenames.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael L. Dean [mailto:mdean@xn1.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:44 AM
To: Bryan Waters; dev-list@opensrs.org
Subject: Re: OpenSRS-SF

my suggestion: move from NT for serious work.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Waters" <bryanw@abwaters.com>
To: <dev-list@opensrs.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: OpenSRS-SF

> I have been trying to get this to work on NT but am having a helluva time
> finding the right versions of packages and modules for perl. The
automated
> install broke miserably but I manually built (with VC6) expat and the
> XML::Parser and got a lot of the packages installed but when I verify I
get
> protocol not supported...from the code this looks like something is wrong
> with the XML parser...
>
> Has anyone got any suggestions or has anyone else gotten this to work on
NT?
> (docs say it should work fine)
>
> -bryanw
> HalfPriceNames Domain Registry
> http://www.halfpricenames.com/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dev-list@opensrs.org [mailto:owner-dev-list@opensrs.org]On
> Behalf Of Colin Viebrock
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:06 AM
> To: Scott Allan
> Cc: dev-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: Re: Client innovation
>
>
> > > 1. Hard cut: make SF official and only "innovate" on that version.
This
> > > would mean that any new functionality would only be developed by us
ion
> > > that code base
> >
> > My choice is this one.d
>
> I agree. Don't spread your resources thin (but do continue to support the
> old
> codebase).
>
> However, I think that there *might* be some issues between the SF
developers
> and
> some RSP developers who contribute patches back to OpenSRS (just read the
> archives
> for email from Joe Rhett for examples).
>
> I have no idea what the situation is, nor do I really care too much. But
if
> OpenSRS
> is going to move into a more transparent development system like
> SourceForge, you
> will need to be prepared for Joe Public offering patches/suggestions/etc..
> Not all
> developers work well in this environment. I hope the people working on
the
> SF client
> are ready to deal with this input, both technically and personally.
>
> - Colin
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:47 EDT