how do you successfully run when you can not see! It doesn't work in track
very well.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lynn W. Taylor" <Lynn@BusCom.net>
To: <dev-list@opensrs.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:59 AM
Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF
> I'm sure those who are successfully running NT will disagree.
>
> OpenSRS runs fine on NT. The appropriate documentation is at
> http://www.atlcon.net/opensrs -- Eric Longman has done a great job keeping
> all of this current, and keeping the appropriate perl modules in PPM
format
> (so you don't have to build them).
>
> -- Lynn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael L. Dean
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:44 AM
> To: Bryan Waters; dev-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF
>
> my suggestion: move from NT for serious work.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bryan Waters" <bryanw@abwaters.com>
> To: <dev-list@opensrs.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM
> Subject: OpenSRS-SF
>
>
> > I have been trying to get this to work on NT but am having a helluva
time
> > finding the right versions of packages and modules for perl. The
> automated
> > install broke miserably but I manually built (with VC6) expat and the
> > XML::Parser and got a lot of the packages installed but when I verify I
> get
> > protocol not supported...from the code this looks like something is
wrong
> > with the XML parser...
> >
> > Has anyone got any suggestions or has anyone else gotten this to work on
> NT?
> > (docs say it should work fine)
> >
> > -bryanw
> > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry
> > http://www.halfpricenames.com/
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dev-list@opensrs.org [mailto:owner-dev-list@opensrs.org]On
> > Behalf Of Colin Viebrock
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:06 AM
> > To: Scott Allan
> > Cc: dev-list@opensrs.org
> > Subject: Re: Client innovation
> >
> >
> > > > 1. Hard cut: make SF official and only "innovate" on that version.
> This
> > > > would mean that any new functionality would only be developed by us
> ion
> > > > that code base
> > >
> > > My choice is this one.d
> >
> > I agree. Don't spread your resources thin (but do continue to support
the
> > old
> > codebase).
> >
> > However, I think that there *might* be some issues between the SF
> developers
> > and
> > some RSP developers who contribute patches back to OpenSRS (just read
the
> > archives
> > for email from Joe Rhett for examples).
> >
> > I have no idea what the situation is, nor do I really care too much.
But
> if
> > OpenSRS
> > is going to move into a more transparent development system like
> > SourceForge, you
> > will need to be prepared for Joe Public offering
patches/suggestions/etc..
> > Not all
> > developers work well in this environment. I hope the people working on
> the
> > SF client
> > are ready to deal with this input, both technically and personally.
> >
> > - Colin
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:47 EDT