On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Charles Daminato wrote:
> We're working on a solution that will not drastically alter the API
> (we do have many legacy resellers to keep in mind)
Understood.
> However, as an enhancement (addition, not alteration) to the API, I'll
> see what I can do here :)
Having a slow compatible path and a fast incompatible path would certainly
encourage the legacy folks to upgrade. Bru-hahahaha!
-- </chris>"Petty bureaucrat... we'll see how he feels after he's been inside our giant clothes dryer and his very garments imprison him like a mummy!"
"ZORT!! Then we can stick tickly things in his nose, right Brain?"
"Let's not be vindictive, Pinky."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:04 EDT