Re: OpenSRS API Question

From: inbox@fpgatools.com
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 16:48:56 EST


On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:35:57 -0500
  "Chris R Chapman" <chris@chapmanconsulting.ca> wrote:
>I just had to pick up on this exchange as I think it
>illustrates a really
>interesting paradigm:
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>You say OpenSRS doesn't support Windows? So bug OpenSRS
>>>support. If they can't meet your needs, and you can't
>>>code your own
>>>solution, go elsewhere.
>
>>As I stated in my first post I did contact OpenSRS tech
>>support by phone before I ever started posting here. In
>>fact I had no idea this "forum" even existed until
>>OpenSRS
>>told me about it.
>
>>*THEY* told me to ask the question here.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>PRECISELY!
>
>THIS is the triumph of "open" projects like OpenSRS; why
>have "OpenSRS
>Techs" at all? "They" haven't the foggiest beyond a
>static list of yes/no
>Q&As, so why not outsource the solution to the listserv
>for next to no cost?

Actually, for the non API questions I've asked via Tucows
Phone Support, I've found that Tucows Tech Support people
*REALLY KNOW THEIR STUFF*! This is another reason I'm
trying so hard to use them exclusively as well as
demonstrate my willingness to allways give credit where
credit it due.

That said OpenSRS just is'nt is the domain of phone
support and thus I support Chris' statement that this is
the place to be.

>The trouble is, they represent the sponsors of the
>"Standard", which is by
>no means a fait accomplis. I think it behooves them to
>be a little more on
>the ball when developers need assistance.

And as I've said I don't think the docs are as bad as the
comments in *OTHER THREADS* suggest! I just think OpenSRS
needs to pull everything together somehow. I made my
suggestions how to do it, but like Chris said this is a
live document thus OpenSRS needs to decides how to do it.

>I've
>encountered the same
>indifferent attitude when asking questions of the techs
>as well. Stock
>reply is "go to the listserv"-- even when its a matter of
>pointing out
>inconsistencies between the API documentation and their
>own PERL scripts.
>
>Sure, it gives us consultants some work, but the flipside
>is that even we
>are stymied from time to time and with little help beyond
>the empty chasms
>of newsgroups and listservs where you hope to find a
>kindred soul who can
>lead you out of the wilderness.

Ahhh, the team spirit is not dead afterall! ;-)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:33 EDT