Fortunately many poeple came to my assistance in trying to
write my own interface ..... Then I was told that even
though my Blowfish algorithm satifies all the test vectors
it will not work for API since the Perl implementation
they use is slightly different than "the standard" ......
I gave up at that point ....
So I guess I have to continue to use enom's nice API for
registration and then manually transfer to Tucows? Or is
Tucows going to simplify their API? Why can't Tucows make
my life so easy?
To be clear --
I really *DISLIKE* using enom and am in no why attempting
to promote them. But I am attempting to shame Tucows into
filling in the only hole I've found in their otherwise
stellar service: an API that is *REASONABLE* to implement
in the Resellers language of choice!
Thank you for this opertunity to vent. ;)
Joe Rhett <jrhett@isite.net> wrote:
>Did you get any takers on this? I wrote a C++ client
>back in late 2000,
>but it is far far out of date now.
>
>On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Frank Michlick
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If anyone has implemented a client code to connect to
>>our API in C++,
>> please email me (fmichlick@tucows.com), I'd be
>>interested in talking
>> to you.
>>
>> Thanks + best regards,
>> Frank Michlick
>
>--
>Joe Rhett
> Chief
>Geek
>JRhett@ISite.Net
> ISite Services, Inc.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:39 EDT