> If communications are encrypted using SSL, that eliminates the need to
> do any encryption in the client code.
Does it? Or does it mean the client has to do the SSL encryption?
SSL does not imply that it is an http transaction.
> John Roche
> einfosystems.net
>
>
> >>Has anyone brought up the possiblity of using SSL to do the encryption
> instead of using blowfish?
>
>
>
> This mail was content checked for malicious code and viruses by
> GFI MailSecurity. GFI MailSecurity provides email content checking,
> exploit detection and anti-virus for Exchange & SMTP servers. Email
> sales@einfosystems.net for more information.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:50 EDT