Ross,
I honestly believe you will reward us all with a very
satisfactory solution to the issues being expressed.
I also wish to appologize for anything I have said that
might suggest I believe otherwise. Fact is I have
experianced more than my far share of offensive off list
flames and my comments were generally directed at those
flamers ....
Thanks for your continued efforts. Tucows is by far ahead
of all other registrars out there in technology, business
ethics, and just plain nice helpful and knowledgable folks
on the phone when I call in.
Thanks!
Charles
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:34:26 -0500
"Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com> wrote:
>On 11/24/2003 2:56 PM L.C. (Laurentiu C. Badea) noted
>that:
>
>>It seems to me (I might be wrong) that the OpenSRS
>>engineers have
>>spent a good deal of effort to create parallel versions
>>of the
>>XML-RPC and SSL protocols.
>
>Yes - back when we did this the very first time around we
>needed to work around a lot of the intellectual property
>and licensing considerations surrounding SSL and RRP.
>
>The dynamic is a lot different now - for instance, we
>need to move forward in a way that doesn't break the
>thousands of installations that are currently out there.
>We're also a lot more careful with what goes in and why.
>
>Anyways, I just wanted to point out that while a lot of
>the conditions that shaped the early versions of the
>protocol have since become irrelevant, the impact is
>still felt - definitely something to consider when
>evaluating the current state of the application and
>protocol.
>
>Regards,
>
>--
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Don't be too timid and squeamish about
>your actions.
> All life is
>an experiment.
> The more experiments you
>make the better."
> - Ralph Waldo Emerson
>
>Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
>My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:50 EDT