I say we move forward .... How about a ADMIN-Handle , a TECH-handle ,
CONT-handle , BILL-handle , SYST-handle , SRS-handle , OVER-handle ,
RESE-handle , and a ??? I'm forgetting something I know ....anyway we (you)
will need them all someday (not today... but I assure you somday) and when
you do get around to realizing .... realize that the right two-handle
combinations may be the key to happyness someday.... or at least avoid a lot
of grief. I have faith that ya'll will figure it out soon enough.
I'm still wondering about whoshowthe mailserver ..... But, Please Please
stop refering to NIC-Handles just call them HANDLES or
SRS-Handles ..... Nic-Handles are old news you can do better than that.
Thank you
----- Original Message -----
From: <dnsadmin@pz.com>
To: Tim Jung <tjung@igateway.net>; <discuss-list@opensrs.org>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: NIC-Handles not important
> >web site. This is another reason why "nic handles are good(tm)". ;)
>
> Have you ever tried updating a NIC-Handle at Network Solutions? Changing
an
> e-mail address on one?
>
> Most people just create "another one" when the e-mail address changes.
This
> leaves stale nic-handles in the database.
>
> Have you ever deleted a NIC-Handle? I've tried numerous times, including
> faxing the authorization letter. To this day, my SC3907 handle exists and
> I can't get rid of it.
>
> I've found NIC-Handles to have many pros, but there are also many cons to
> it as well. I find them to be a messy implementation to a needed
solution.
>
> As Ross Rader said: (tm)
> ==================
> "I sincerely think that we have an obligation to consider breaking as much
> as possible. What I mean is that we can't afford to think for one second
> that the entire system as it works today is perfect. Without at least
> thinking about new approaches to old processes, we're all stuck in a mire
> of imperfection."
>
> Ross is a bright gentlemen and I support his concept. Let's really figure
> out a way that is better than NIC-Handles and the web username/password
> combination if it is possible.
>
> I'm not excited about going back to the Network Solutions implementation
> method of NIC-Handles. I'm a seasoned Internet Professional just like you
> are Tim, and I have a grasp on the industry as a whole. My comments equal
> yours.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:19 EDT