At 12:12 PM 4/3/00 -0700, Tiger Technologies wrote:
>At 4/3/00 9:35 AM, sys@zanmai.com wrote:
>
<snip societal philosophies>
>>222/37,000 = .00594 This is what it is all about?
>
>Nope. As I said, I accept that as normal.
>
>What this is about is that I suspect the number will eventually be more
>like .05 for OpenSRS if the policy is not changed.
Why? Based on what facts/data or model? Or is that just an unsupported
"hunch"?
Whell since were are now playing psychics, I called the Psychic Friends
Hotline and they suspect that "the number will stay the same or go lower".
Place your bets.
> Throw in $25
>chargeback fees and such, and that's a quarter of my profits. I'd like to
>discourage that if there's a reasonable way to do it.
There is. STOP taking credit cards, or find a merchant bank that has a more
favorible DAK/chargeback policy ... any questions?
>
>Again, though, this is all opinion and I may well turn out to be wrong;
>we'll simply have to wait and see what happens.
And no rational business would base or change their established procedures
based on unsupported opinion, faith, hunches or superstition.
>
>>The problem is there are millions of fresh lowlife teenagers created every
>>year, and they don't all network their bad experiences together,
>
>But they *do* network their good experiences together. It is for this
>reason that I'd like to avoid being one of their good experiences.
Sez the media ... if they really were organized and effectively
communicative they'd already rule the world.
Best Regards,
Eric Ross
QuickNames.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:28 EDT