> >>222/37,000 = .00594 This is what it is all about?
> >
> >Nope. As I said, I accept that as normal.
> >
> >What this is about is that I suspect the number will eventually be more
> >like .05 for OpenSRS if the policy is not changed.
>
> Why? Based on what facts/data or model? Or is that just an unsupported
> "hunch"?
>
the model is called "game theory". but let's put it this way: have you
ever heard of removable faces for car stereos? do you believe that they
reduce the number of stolen stereos? Why? It's just as easy to steal the
stereo. Oh, it must be because the stereo is USELESS without the face.
Look it up. What is the purpose of a removable face for a car stereo? To
deter theft. Now you tell me why having a removable face would deter
theft.
Sure, chargebacks will always exist, but if you don't allow a user to keep
the domain s/he charged back, it will be USELESS, hence it will happen
much less.
> Whell since were are now playing psychics, I called the Psychic Friends
> Hotline and they suspect that "the number will stay the same or go lower".
> Place your bets.
>
I've placed mine.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:28 EDT