Re: Transfers: A bit of an explanation

From: ECS (edseward@cmpsource.com)
Date: Wed Apr 05 2000 - 03:25:22 EDT


----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "ECS" <edseward@cmpsource.com>
Cc: <discuss-list@opensrs.org>; <lists@tigertech.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: Transfers: A bit of an explanation

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 05-Apr-2000 ECS wrote:
> > After reading his comments in a large number of
messages, I got curious and
> > looked at quicknames.com. The first thing I saw as
banners, for Believe it
> > or Not, "Network Solutions!". The next thing I read
was that his sites
> > services were free as a public service. I must admit at
this point I was
> > even more curious.
>
> I never believe that the proper way to refute someone you
disagree with is to
> go to their business and criticize the way they are
running it. Their comments
> and positions should be taken on their merits, not based
on what their website
> says or how they manage it.
>
> With that said, I want to point out that many on this list
are in the PROCESS
> of going live. And in any event, at the top of the
webpage in question is the
> following:
> News Flash 4.2.00 : Coming soon .... $15 Domain Names!

You are right. It does say that. But it wasn't posted two
days ago. It was posted after I sent him a copy of the
message for comment.

And my purpose in sending the message is that I believe this
list should be restricted to resellers. As I stated.

And the message was to refute the agruments he had been
making. I would suggest you go back and read the responses
he had made to others during the discussion I referenced.
>From his previous messages, he made it appear he was
involved in performing domain name registrations himself,
taking the full risk of doing business, including accepting
credit cards for domain name registrations. In fact, he
stated in one message that only those involved and
experienced with credit card loss should respond, implying
he was. His site showed otherwise.

Sorry we don't agree on this. So far we are batting about
50% on agreeing with each other's position.

My point stands. I don't believe this list should be open
to the public.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:28 EDT