Re: Automated CC processing

From: WebWiz (webwiz@atlcon.net)
Date: Mon May 01 2000 - 14:21:16 EDT


I'd be OK with this, but would expect OpenSRS to put a minimum on it. For
example, you could set up a rule that says "If my balance falls below x
RCU's (or dollars or whatever), then transfer $500 from my checking account,
credit me for 50 RCU's, and notify me."

My guess is that OpenSRS would prefer not to be in the position where they
automatically debit any type of account, in order to avoid disputes. The
way they do it now, they have a document in hand that very clearly indicates
that you ASKED them to take the money. You'd have a hard time charging back
any such payment.

My $0.02....

Regards,
Eric Longman
Atl-Connect Internet Services

----- Original Message -----
From: "The Dot Project Support" <support@thedotproject.com>
To: "Vicky Chandna" <vickyji@vsnl.com>; "Payments@Opensrs. Org"
<payments@opensrs.org>
Cc: "Discuss-List" <discuss-list@opensrs.org>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Automated CC processing

I'd say that's a good idea. I think another good idea would be to allow RSPs
to give their bank account info to OpenSRS and then OpenSRS would take money
out of the account whenever necessary. What do you think?

Justin Stayton
The Dot Project Admin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vicky Chandna" <vickyji@vsnl.com>
To: "Payments@Opensrs. Org" <payments@opensrs.org>
Cc: "Discuss-List" <discuss-list@opensrs.org>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 12:59 PM
Subject: Automated CC processing

> HI
> I remember seeing an OpenSRS notice that the CC charge system would be
> automated.
> Sending a FAX for each payment has become tedious.
> Would it be possible to add a MAKE PAYMENT link at the rr interface, which
> should autmatically provide sufficient validation.
>
> Secondly, what about hard copies of invoices for our accounting purposes.
> For us it is mandatory to provide proper bills for all activities.
>
> Awaiting your solutions
> vicky
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:32 EDT