:)
this should be a reason not to use their services.
but in fact they are not liable for anything as it
is well written in their terms of blabla.
actually they (nsi) hijacked a domain name i registered
with them (nsi) claiming there was an error.
but what can i do? - nothing. too bad but these are
the facts. and people who still trust them and say
"they are expensive but they are big and that's why i will
use their service" should be liable for that mistake. :)
regards,
doytchin spiridonov.
"William X. Walsh" wrote:
> Hello Doytchin,
>
> Friday, June 02, 2000, 12:52:01 AM, you wrote:
>
> DS> Huh the problem is not so much with NSI but with the owners.
>
> DS> Personally I think the owner is responsible if he set up MAIL-FROM
> DS> authentication because he is lazy to read one or two pages with
> DS> explanations.
>
> You might have a point, if it wasn't for the fact that his is the
> default security, and that no where does NSI draw customers' attention
> to the fact and explain to them why it is imperative they change it.
> Or better yet, eliminate the security method altogether. This has
> been a problem for SEVERAL YEARS. Now it is becoming rampant, with
> hundreds of forged templates all the time.
>
> To try and excuse NSI or say they are not negligent on this issue is
> just not looking at the big issue. Remember, Doytchin, the vast
> majority of domain name registrants are not as knowledgable as you
> about how the system works.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:37 EDT