Hello Philippe,
Friday, June 02, 2000, 10:50:20 AM, you wrote:
PL> on Thu, 1 Jun 2000, "Rodney Payne" <opensrs@anthill.com> wrote:
>>Can't opensrs help these people??
PL> The situation is currently at an impasse. The whois record still
PL> shows the site with the alleged thief, going by the name of Billy Tandoko, registered as administrative contact, technical contact, zone contact
PL> and billing contact for the domain. Network Solutions is still
PL> waiting to hear back from TUCOWS about what they intend to do
PL> to correct the fraudulent domain name transfer. TUCOWS did not
PL> respond to calls from InternetNews for additional details.
PL> http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article/0,2171,3_386441,00.html
Don't believe NSI :) They've blatently lied to the press on similar
issues in the past.
PL> not only does Tucows/OpenSRS give NSI an undeserved
PL> PR-advantage, it is also very disappointing that they
PL> did not act swiftly and as soon as the events became known.
PL> Tucows - why ?
This problem rests squarely on NSI's shoulders. Their mail-from
security problem permitted the admin contact to be changed. Any
delays or other problems are a direct result of that, and no one but
NSI should bear any responsibility for it. NSI may try and shift it,
because they want to pretend they aren't culpable for the original
change.
-- Best regards, William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:37 EDT