Just an FYI that the RSP that started the thread has notified my off list
that after providing the proper documentation to OpenSRS, the domains in
question were put on hold, per the previously stated OpenSRS policy.
> No one is asking OpenSRS to take action until proof of theft is
> provided. OpenSRS has a valid right to require proof of theft before
> talking action and would be stupid not to do this.
>
> The RSP that stated this debate has proof of theft in the form of a bank
> charge back for fifteen domain names registrations. He has proof that
> the credit card owner or the credit card owner's son is the thief
> because the credit card owner/family has the domain names for sale at
> Great Domain with their names all over them. So we have proof of theft
> and proof that the thief has the stolen property and is trying to
> dispose of it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:38 EDT