This issue has arisen on this list before.
Perhaps someone from Opensrs can explain their position,
and / or refer to a previous post from Opensrs about this.
Personally and professionally, the more security around domain names, the
better.
Swerve
> From: "ecs" <edseward@edseward.com>
> Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 19:52:41 -0500
> To: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>, "ecs"
> <edseward@edseward.com>
> Cc: "Dave Warren" <maillist@devilsplayground.net>, "Southpaw/NINEpm"
> <southpaw505@home.com>, "OpenSRS Discussion List" <discuss-list@opensrs.org>
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: Transfers in general
>
> William,
>
> You sound like a broken record.
>
> I've asked you before to gave an example of an RSP that has
> done something seriously wrong to a client to justify your
> attitude toward RSPs.
>
> I'm still waiting for you to provide that example to the
> list.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
> [mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org]On Behalf Of William
> X. Walsh
> Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 12:42 PM
> To: ecs
> Cc: Dave Warren; Southpaw/NINEpm; OpenSRS Discussion List
> Subject: Re[2]: Transfers in general
>
>
> Hello ecs,
>
> Sunday, September 03, 2000, 8:48:14 AM, you wrote:
>
>> And yes, I know some on this list will respond that one
> RSP
>> out of the thousands with OpenSRS may be a bad apple, so
>> none of the RSPs should be trusted to have an impact on
> this
>> decision. Sorry, but I still do not buy the argument that
>> some day in the far far future there might be a bad RSP,
> so
>> let's punish all RSPs today.
>
> And when OpenSRS's accreditation is at risk over denying
> transfers for
> false reasons, are you going to indemnify them?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William
> mailto:william@userfriendly.com
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:51 EDT