Hi Marc,
I'm actually not sure how v3.com is doing re-directs except for the fact
that it's all Windows NT based.
When we finally sold easy.to to them (including your nice i.am subdomain ;p)
we were still using the ErrorDoc under Apache/Linux.
Regards,
Rick
"Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are quick to anger, and
devastating in power." - Unknown
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Jeftovic" <markjr@easyDNS.com>
To: <storage@eu.iewebs.com>; <discuss-list@opensrs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Domain Redirection & Cloaking
At 04:45 PM 10/3/00 -0000, Adam Beecher wrote:
>Rick Macdougall <rickm@axess.com> said:
>
>> Actually since the ErrorDocument is re-directed I don\'t believe the
server
>> returns an error code. In our case (I used to own easy.to till we sold
it
>> to v3.com) it returned a META Refresh page and I don\'t remember ever
having
>> any problems with Web spiders.
>>
>> Give http://i.am/canadian a try if you wish to verify that.
>>
>Fair point - I tried it with wget and it sent a 200.
>
Are they still using the ErrorDoc method tho? I said the thing about the
request codes because way back when I was coding the original easyDNS
stealthing that's what I tried too, and that was the problem I ran into.
Also, I have i.am/stuntpope and mine just does a redirect, it does not
stealth. But I set mine up years ago.
At any rate, by far the most common method (and the one we ended up going
with) is to output a frameset around the target URL.
-mark
---- Mark Jeftovic, <markjr@easydns.com> easyDNS Technologies Inc. http://www.easyDNS.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:35:59 EDT