At 11:12 AM 4/16/01 -0400, Chuck Hatcher wrote:
>Interesting. Can you provide one example of two functional hosts with
>adjacent IP addresses which are not on the same physical network?
Here ya go...
ictech: {21} % trace 198.6.1.1
traceroute to 198.6.1.1 (198.6.1.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 161.58.0.3 (161.58.0.3) 0.471 ms 0.390 ms 0.373 ms
2 ge-1-2-0.r01.mclnva02.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.31.189) 0.441
ms 0.417 ms 0.417 ms
3 ATM2-0.BR4.DCA8.ALTER.NET (137.39.52.53) 1.184 ms 1.315 ms 1.118 ms
4 0.so-5-1-0.XR2.DCA8.ALTER.NET (152.63.36.26) 1.469 ms 1.414 ms 1.397 ms
5 288.at-2-0-0.XR2.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.35.106) 3.373 ms 3.390
ms 3.451 ms
6 501.ATM6-0.GW3.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.1) 3.503 ms 3.619 ms 3.984 ms
7 pos5-0.soesr1.ash.ops.us.uu.net (207.18.173.162) 3.926 ms 3.635
ms 3.649 ms
8 gig1-0.esr-b-10-9-2.ash.ops.us.uu.net (198.5.240.36) 4.064 ms 3.641
ms 4.300 ms
9 cache00.ns.uu.net (198.6.1.1) 3.793 ms 4.081 ms 4.014 ms
ictech: {22} % trace 198.6.1.2
traceroute to 198.6.1.2 (198.6.1.2), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 161.58.0.3 (161.58.0.3) 4.475 ms 6.257 ms 2.594 ms
2 ge-1-2-0.r01.mclnva02.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.31.189) 2.768
ms 3.212 ms 3.675 ms
3 ATM2-0.BR4.DCA8.ALTER.NET (137.39.52.53) 2.833 ms 5.313 ms 4.659 ms
4 0.so-5-1-0.XR1.DCA8.ALTER.NET (152.63.36.22) 1.854 ms 1.431 ms 1.500 ms
5 0.so-2-0-0.TR1.DCA8.ALTER.NET (152.63.25.37) 3.662 ms 2.228 ms 1.273 ms
6 115.at-6-0-0.TR1.DFW9.ALTER.NET (146.188.141.146) 41.048 ms 41.047
ms 40.990 ms
7 289.at-2-0-0.XR1.DFW7.ALTER.NET (152.63.99.53) 42.080 ms 42.044
ms 42.087 ms
8 191.ATM9-0-0.GW1.DFW7.ALTER.NET (146.188.241.129) 42.884 ms 42.436
ms 42.992 ms
9 fe1-0.dfw7soesr1.alter.net (207.18.172.90) 47.303 ms 42.402
ms 47.629 ms
10 dfw7sosrv6.alter.net (208.204.150.86) 47.168 ms 47.034 ms 43.234 ms
--Bill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:23 EDT