On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 Swerve@Swerve.com wrote:
> I wonder what God and others who have personal and spiritual relationships
> to this entity and word might think and feel about your desire to
> exclusively control this TLD.
irrelevant. namespace belongs to humanity. Gods interest in this is non
existent. in the beginning God gave all of you a very special gift. and
what you have done to it is rape it, spoil it, and in the process you
manage to exterminate each other with a certain level of efficiency that
makes me and any other intelligence sick.
i say to you that any man or woman who would oppose us is petty and
vain. and by default their indulgence in god more fiction then fact.
anyway - we have various churches and spiritual organization registered
under .god - so i don't see a problem. if you find any holy roller who
objects - send them to me. because i say with absolute certainty that God
does not maintain a complaints department.
regards
joe baptista
p.s. be careful pretty soon i'll start quoting scripture and then we'll
all be sorry. i feel the spirit moving me. and then poor Ross will have
to step in and we'll end up with a dogs breakfast.
>
> regards,
>
> Swerve
>
> > From: baptista@pccf.net
> > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:17:37 -0400 (EDT)
> > To: Swerve@Swerve.com
> > Cc: baptista@pccf.net, Duane Cook <dcook@9netweb.com>,
> > discuss-list@opensrs.org
> > Subject: Re: was ...Re: www.dotsex.com, now is .God ?
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 Swerve@Swerve.com wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Joe,
> >>
> >> Checked out the link to your site in the last email.
> >>
> >> Are you claiming exclusive intellectual property rights under .God ?
> >
> > yes - we are.
> >
> > regards
> > joe
> >
> > p.s. - i have just been informed by the solicitor of record that pennance
> > has been done. we are now moving to the next stage - salvation. it will
> > take 24 hours for me to confirm the penance.
> >
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> Swerve
> >>
> >>> From: baptista@pccf.net
> >>> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:24:19 -0400 (EDT)
> >>> To: Duane Cook <dcook@9netweb.com>
> >>> Cc: discuss-list@opensrs.org
> >>> Subject: Re: www.dotsex.com
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Duane Cook wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Can someone tell me if this new .sex domain is legimate?
> >>>> or if it is like the fake domains that new.net is selling?
> >>>>
> >>>> www.dotsex.com
> >>>
> >>> in short no
> >>>
> >>> the long story is here:
> >>>
> >>>
> >> http://www.dot-god.com/communications/TLD_Networks_Ltd/public_announcement.h
> >> tm> l
> >>>
> >>> including links to corporate documents and other fluff.
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> joe baptista
> >>>
> >>> p.s. one more thing not yet indexed - his affidavit response to WIPO
> >>> concerning dotsex.com - he lied.
> >>>
> >>> he's threatened to sue us - now according to his lawyer he wants to make
> >>> peace. at this time we have asked for a show of penance. we will see
> >>> what happens.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
> >>>
> >>> http://www.dot-god.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
> >
> > http://www.dot-god.com/
> >
> >
>
-- The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:38 EDT