On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 Swerve@Swerve.com wrote:
> If you believe what you just wrote, that "namespace belongs to humanity",
> why are you opposed to others setting up other alternative roots under .God?
simple answer - look up the technical bible - rfc 1591.
> The word God is a common word in the public domain. I don't see why you and
> your ministry should have exclusive control of .God. In fact, the more
> this whole alternative root thing is unfolding, including New.Nets foray, i
> think we need a centralized body to manage this namespace.
no - we need another jon postel. we already have a centralized body and
as a result of that we have ended up with a dogs breakfast.
>
> Imo, Icann has been messing up for a long time. The alternatives that
> appear to be unfolding seem to be making things messier.
your right there. icann has made a mess of it. and most of the
alternatives are still wandering in the desert. but there is good forward
motion. the tlda is the first attempt and i hope the last. but hope is
for fools and lovers.
new.net is an excellent example of stupidity. they have an opportunity to
lead - yet they choose to collide and contribute to the problem. yet when
new.net was asked the question here - what if icann ends up setting up
simular tlds. their response was why should they.
i found that reply funny and offensive. basically one sinner pointing the
finger at another. very droll.
regards
joe
>
>
>
> Swerve
>
> > Gods interest in this is non
> > existent. in the beginning God gave all of you a very special gift. and
> > what you have done to it is rape it, spoil it, and in the process you
> > manage to exterminate each other with a certain level of efficiency that
> > makes me and any other intelligence sick.
>
> Are you part of the "you" that you are referring to above, or is it only the
> rest of us?
>
> >
> > i say to you that any man or woman who would oppose us is petty and
> > vain. and by default their indulgence in god more fiction then fact.
>
> I oppose your attempt to exclusively control the .God domain. Why is that
> petty and vain?
> >
> > anyway - we have various churches and spiritual organization registered
> > under .god - so i don't see a problem. if you find any holy roller who
> > objects - send them to me. because i say with absolute certainty that God
> > does not maintain a complaints department.
> >
> > regards
> > joe baptista
> >
> > p.s. be careful pretty soon i'll start quoting scripture and then we'll
> > all be sorry. i feel the spirit moving me. and then poor Ross will have
> > to step in and we'll end up with a dogs breakfast.
> >
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> Swerve
> >>
> >>> From: baptista@pccf.net
> >>> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:17:37 -0400 (EDT)
> >>> To: Swerve@Swerve.com
> >>> Cc: baptista@pccf.net, Duane Cook <dcook@9netweb.com>,
> >>> discuss-list@opensrs.org
> >>> Subject: Re: was ...Re: www.dotsex.com, now is .God ?
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 Swerve@Swerve.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Joe,
> >>>>
> >>>> Checked out the link to your site in the last email.
> >>>>
> >>>> Are you claiming exclusive intellectual property rights under .God ?
> >>>
> >>> yes - we are.
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> joe
> >>>
> >>> p.s. - i have just been informed by the solicitor of record that pennance
> >>> has been done. we are now moving to the next stage - salvation. it will
> >>> take 24 hours for me to confirm the penance.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Swerve
> >>>>
> >>>>> From: baptista@pccf.net
> >>>>> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:24:19 -0400 (EDT)
> >>>>> To: Duane Cook <dcook@9netweb.com>
> >>>>> Cc: discuss-list@opensrs.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: www.dotsex.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Duane Cook wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Can someone tell me if this new .sex domain is legimate?
> >>>>>> or if it is like the fake domains that new.net is selling?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> www.dotsex.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> in short no
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the long story is here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://www.dot-god.com/communications/TLD_Networks_Ltd/public_announcement.>
> >>> h
> >>>> tm> l
> >>>>>
> >>>>> including links to corporate documents and other fluff.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards
> >>>>> joe baptista
> >>>>>
> >>>>> p.s. one more thing not yet indexed - his affidavit response to WIPO
> >>>>> concerning dotsex.com - he lied.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> he's threatened to sue us - now according to his lawyer he wants to make
> >>>>> peace. at this time we have asked for a show of penance. we will see
> >>>>> what happens.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.dot-god.com/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
> >>>
> >>> http://www.dot-god.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
> >
> > http://www.dot-god.com/
> >
> >
>
-- The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:38 EDT