i agree rfc 1591 is dated - but it applies just as well to tlds as to
cctlds and gtlds. a tld is a tld. the spirt of rfc 1591 is very much
alive and well - and in my opinoin te only solution to this problem.
regards
joe
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, William X Walsh wrote:
> Friday, Friday, August 24, 2001, 3:22:30 PM, Swerve@swerve.com wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 Swerve@Swerve.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> If you believe what you just wrote, that "namespace belongs to humanity",
> >>> why are you opposed to others setting up other alternative roots under .God?
> >>
> >> simple answer - look up the technical bible - rfc 1591.
>
> > I'll check that when i have a chance. I will guess that you are opposed to
> > colliding roots. I am very concerned about this whole issue, so your
> > patience is appreciated.
>
> It doesn't say what he wants to make everyone believe it says.
>
> RFC1591 was tailored to specifically deal with ccTLD delegation
> issues, and even states specifically that it was written with the
> expectation that no new gTLDs would be coming along, making it clear
> it does not deal with gTLD issues in any way.
>
> And even if you want to claim it deals with all TLDs, it certainly
> doesn't support the concept of the anarchist free for all that Joe and
> his anarchy namespace compatriots claim it does.
>
>
-- The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:38 EDT