Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info)

• Next message: Paul Chvostek: "Expiry tracking"
• Previous message: Philippe Landau: "domain name speculation (Re: The latest data on domain name sales"
• In reply to: Shawn Pritchard: "RE: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: Re: .info)"
• Next in thread: Dave Warren: "Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info)"
• Reply: Dave Warren: "Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> (I'm speaking mostly about
> the lack of a date-validation on the trademark-date field)
>

Actually, it's quite good that they did *not* do this. Otherwise
people would have just entered "correct" dates. Fraudulent
registrations are now much easier identifiable (if they would just do
that ...).

Kai

--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com

• Next message: Paul Chvostek: "Expiry tracking"
• Previous message: Philippe Landau: "domain name speculation (Re: The latest data on domain name sales"
• In reply to: Shawn Pritchard: "RE: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: Re: .info)"
• Next in thread: Dave Warren: "Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info)"
• Reply: Dave Warren: "Re: The Great info'n'domain Swindle (was: .info)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:41 EDT