Re: Off Topic Replies - actual topic revisited

From: bill@daze.net
Date: Fri Dec 07 2001 - 13:12:43 EST


> Yesterday I was told "this" is what the list is for, and "why" the list
> exist. I know the obvious. What I get a kick out of is that despite the
> point of my post, I got an off topic reply each time and not one person
> covered my point. I wrote (typed) please don't make an anti-statement
> because I wanted any replies to stay on topic. There is a lot of "reading
> between the lines here" and that is cool but I'd like on occasion for folks
> to actually respond to a point rather than find a reason to disagree. If
> anyone cares to, read yesterdays post again and flame me on topic. :)
> Otherwise, off topic replies will generally make me laugh.

You are quite an interesting person. You seem to think everyone is
flaming you. I would suggest you actually read the replies instead of
assuming they are flames. I'm not sure what lists you are used to, but
flaming on the OpenSRS lists is rare.
 
> In case anyone missed it, my post was regarding:
>
> SUPPORT FOR NEW RESELLERS

EXACTLY WHAT I REPLIED TO.

Once again, OpenSRS employs a PEER SUPPORT MODEL and these mailing lists
(discuss-list, dev-list, policy-list) are where the support is handled.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:54 EDT