My two cents on this one...
I believe the only reason we have to pay for domains on expiry is because
Verisign has that 'autorenew' feature on a domains expiry.....some other
registries don't work that way....I think it's more a comprimise that was
made when fitting the rules from the Single Registrar model into the new
reality of multiple registrars...and not something we can infer 'ownership'
from.
Thanks,
Ken
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
> [mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org]On Behalf Of Michael Brody
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:14 PM
> To: Don Brown; discuss-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: Scott Allen is full of x- that is way out of line
>
>
> then we disagree.
>
> michael
>
> At 11:57 AM 1/2/2002 -0600, Don Brown wrote:
> >At 12:49 PM 1/2/02 -0500, Michael Brody wrote:
> >
> >>If the registrar has put up the money to hold the domain then
> don't they
> >>have some form of rights to the domain? The registrar is in
> fact holding
> >>the domains because they have put up their money to hold the names.
> >>
> >>michael
> >>mbrody@tldsystems.com
> >
> >No.
> >
> >
> >----
> >Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
> >donbrown@inetconcepts.net http://www.inetconcepts.net
> >PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049
> >Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
> >----
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:58 EDT