Re: OpenSRS-sf or OpenSRS software?

From: Paul Sisson (psisson@ring.vpop.net)
Date: Wed Jan 02 2002 - 14:02:31 EST

Next message: Kris Benson: "Re: long waiting times"
Previous message: Don Brown: "RE: Re[2]: Scott Allen is full of x- that is way out of line"
In reply to: Charles Daminato: "RE: OpenSRS-sf or OpenSRS software?"
Next in thread: Thomas Mon: "Pending Orders that are "taken" but there is no WHOIS..."
Reply: Thomas Mon: "Pending Orders that are "taken" but there is no WHOIS..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wednesday 02 January 2002 10:11, Charles Daminato wrote:
> AFAIK it has been updated to the latest (2.46), I'll find out for
> sure.

Yes, all 2.46 modifications are included in release 1.50 of the SF
client, however 1.50 introduced a few bugs that will be fixed in
release 1.51 which I hope to release today...

Regards,
Paul Sisson

Next message: Kris Benson: "Re: long waiting times"
Previous message: Don Brown: "RE: Re[2]: Scott Allen is full of x- that is way out of line"
In reply to: Charles Daminato: "RE: OpenSRS-sf or OpenSRS software?"
Next in thread: Thomas Mon: "Pending Orders that are "taken" but there is no WHOIS..."
Reply: Thomas Mon: "Pending Orders that are "taken" but there is no WHOIS..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:58 EDT