oh well,
it tells us a few things:
1. why snapnames did no react earlier, after all this was threatening their
business, now it only enhances it
2. the backroom deals are already made
3. again somebody else got/has the edge
in answer to this we might perhaps come to a model where we, since we are
more expensive then they are under all circumstances, because we have to)
might give the customer x amount discount when he signs a straight away
release to allow us to pick up the domain if and when he(she) lets it expire
or no longer wants it.
That should sound "proper" enough i think.
thinking of the "proper" way, what do we do with non-paid for domains (CC
Fraud, yes it happens a lot) do we drop them too ? or do we try to re-sell
them ? and if we re-sell do w do that including the cost for the chargeback
or excluding ?
Dear mr Allen (Scot for friends and enemies)
can we please please have some tools added that are maybe slightly less
ethical in the eyes of some, so those who want to make it worth their while
can do something against this hungry machine called verisign, who (in asnwer
to another email) does NOT drop domains as we are supposed to do ?
abel
On Friday 04 January 2002 10:30 pm, Don Brown wrote:
> Could it be that the deal is really already done and the proposal is just a
> distraction? Draw your own conclusion after reading this exciting press
> release from VeriSign:
>
> http://corporate.verisign.com/news/2002/pr_20020104.html
>
> ----
> Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
> donbrown@inetconcepts.net http://www.inetconcepts.net
> PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049
> Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
> ----
-- Abel Wisman office +44-20 84 24 24 2 2 mobile +44-78 12 14 19 16www.able-towers.com for all your hosting and co-location at affordable prices www.url.org domainregistrations, there is no better www.grid9.net bandwidth sales, for high-grade solutions www.telesave.net for the best rates on long distance calls
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:58 EDT