Even if one wasn't feeling vindictive, and yet felt that .Ca should be for
Canadians or those with a Canadian presence, then contacting Cira would be
appropriate.
That said, i understand the desire for Californians
to have domains with .Ca.
Swerve
> From: Robert Rivers <rrivers@tucows.com>
> Organization: Tucows/OpenSRS
> Reply-To: rrivers@opensrs.org
> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:18:03 -0500
> To: discuss-list@opensrs.net
> Subject: Re: .ca's to non Canadians
>
>
> If you are feeling vindictive, CIRA does monitor such things. I'm not
> sure of the compliant procedure. Contact CIRA directly.
>
> CIRA does hold the Registrar responsible. We in turn, dump it on the RSP
> so it's probably in your best interest to head off problems before they
> occur.
> --
>
> Robert Rivers
> OpenSRS Technical Operations
> http://www.opensrs.org/Support_FAQ.shtml
>
> lists@sphynx.idontknow.com wrote:
>>
>> We received a request to register a .ca name for a fellow that is located
>> in California, not much of a surprise its bound to happen. However during
>> our due diligence we asked the registrant to confirm which of the Canadian
>> presence requirements they met, it was at that point the customer canceled
>> their order.
>>
>> The customers order was filled out like any normal order, except for the
>> fact it was all USA type info (zip codes, city etc) however the magical
>> country of "Canada" was picked.
>>
>> Now, because I had a funny feeling I watched this name for a few days (some
>> would say its because I had a bunch of time on my hands this last week...)
>> today the name shows up as registered to the exact same .com that requested
>> it from us, this time with Toronto Ontario as the address, and a California
>> area code...
>>
>> Is there a formal complaint procedure for dealing with this?
>> Or am I free to sell .CA to people in California who are willing to be
>> untruthful on their applications.
>
> --
>
> Robert Rivers
> OpenSRS Technical Operations
> http://www.opensrs.org/Support_FAQ.shtml
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:59 EDT