We still haven't gotten the full story yet from all registrants involved,
primary indication is this appeared (to our system) like a legitimate
change. This is something that compliance does not need to be involved in
(preliminary investigation)
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Product Manager
Tucows Inc. - chuck@tucows.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger B.A. Klorese [mailto:rogerk@queernet.org]
> Sent: March 18, 2002 10:09 AM
> To: Charles Daminato
> Cc: discuss-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: RE: hijacking, AGAIN
>
>
> At 10:00 AM 3/18/2002 -0500, Charles Daminato wrote:
> >Roger,
> >
> >hijacking/stolen domains are a very rare occurence. The cost of
> having 24/7
> >compliance (who would not be very effective outside business
> hours, except
> >perhaps a shoulder to cry on) would be likely prohibitive and
> perhaps fall
> >onto the OpenSRS reseller to help subsidize the cost.
> Discussions will have
> >to be held internally on the viability of introducing something
> like this.
>
>
> As I said: since in this case "compliance determination" was
> entirely from
> web server and application logs, it sounds like it would have been quite
> effective.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:06 EDT