i was half kidding...
:-)
> From: "Charles Daminato" <chuck@tucows.com>
> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:05:12 -0500
> To: "Swerve" <swerve@swerve.com>, "Donny Simonton" <donny@intercosmos.com>,
> <discuss-list@opensrs.net>
> Subject: RE: New Verisign tactic with whois?
>
> Nope, ICANN is a not-for-profit organization afaik
>
> Charles Daminato
> OpenSRS Product Manager
> Tucows Inc. - chuck@tucows.com
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
>> [mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org]On Behalf Of Swerve
>> Sent: April 4, 2002 2:02 PM
>> To: Donny Simonton; discuss-list@opensrs.net
>> Subject: Re: New Verisign tactic with whois?
>>
>>
>> Doesn't Verisign own Icann?
>>
>> :-)
>>
>>> From: "Donny Simonton" <donny@intercosmos.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:15:04 -0600
>>> To: "'Judith Schreger - eWave'" <judith.schreger@ewave.at>,
>>> <discuss-list@opensrs.net>
>>> Subject: RE: New Verisign tactic with whois?
>>>
>>> Based on the Registrar Accreditation Agreement that all registrars sign
>>> with ICANN which is located at
>>> http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm.
>>>
>>> Requires all Registrations to provide WHOIS information and one of the
>>> includes:
>>> 3.3.1.5 The expiration date of the registration;
>>>
>>> So Verisign is breaking their Agreement with ICANN.
>>>
>>> Donny
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org [mailto:owner-discuss-
>>>> list@opensrs.org] On Behalf Of Judith Schreger - eWave
>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:48 AM
>>>> To: discuss-list@opensrs.net
>>>> Subject: AW: New Verisign tactic with whois?
>>>>
>>>> hi there,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> happened to me too (with three or four domains last and this week).
>>>> i don't think it's about making it harder to get away, but to make it
>>>> impossible to guess if a domain is still paid for or expired, and if
>>> it is
>>>> expired when it will be released by them.
>>>>
>>>> kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> judith
>>>>
>>>> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
>>>> [mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org]Im Auftrag von Ivan
>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. April 2002 09:49
>>>> An: discuss-list@opensrs.net
>>>> Betreff: New Verisign tactic with whois?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi List.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I gained a new client last week and when I looked up his domains,
>>> they
>>>> had expired. So, I explained we would have to renew them with netsol
>>> (the
>>>> current registrar). So i did as said (for 1 year of course). NOW,
>>> after
>>>> the
>>>> whois update, I am seeing that the expired date is no longer even
>>> being
>>>> shown.... for both domains.
>>>>
>>>> Am I getting paranoid in thinking that as they update whois data for
>>>> domains, they are stripping away the expires date to make it even
>>> harder
>>>> to
>>>> get away from them at the right time????
>>>>
>>>> Any one else seen this on newly changed data at net sol??
>>>>
>>>> The domain is PYRINEX.COM should anyone want to view this.
>>>>
>>>> _ivan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:09 EDT