This will definitely be a service that customers expect us to be able to
offer. I know that the .name registry is a bit out of sorts at the
moment, but please keep the pressure on them to offer this upgrade as a
normal part of their product. Customers will not understand - and they
would be correct in their thinking - when the registry processes for
this make it impossible or financially unattractive.
me@myname.name is the format that .name domain holders will expect. It's
what's being hyped as the "permanent" email address, and
me@me.myname.name is not the same...
-t
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
> [mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Waters
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:46 AM
> To: Mark Petersen; Charles Oldfield; Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net
> Subject: RE: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades
>
>
> Yeah...I can do that. But its still 3rd level...
>
> you know... *@first.last.name instead of
>
> first@last.name
>
> Its awkward at the 3rd level. Regardless, I actually had one
> client threaten to go to another registrar if I can't offer
> him such an obvious service. My problem is that I agree with
> him. We should offer this service, although there is not
> place he can go... :(
>
> -bryanw
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
> [mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org]On Behalf Of Mark Petersen
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:02 AM
> To: Bryan Waters; Charles Oldfield; Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net
> Subject: Re: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades
>
>
> Does your email server support a default user? Like
> "catchrest"? Couldn't you just set up that user, and it
> forward everything to wherever?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bryan Waters" <bryanw@abwaters.com>
> To: "Charles Oldfield" <charles@mnsi.net>;
> "Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net" <discuss-list@opensrs.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:57 PM
> Subject: RE: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades
>
>
> > Yeah...i offered that. Not good enough... ;(
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charles Oldfield [mailto:charles@mnsi.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:05 PM
> > To: Bryan Waters; Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net
> > Subject: Re: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades
> >
> >
> > Might be longer than they want, but why don't they just set up an mx
> record
> > for the .name domain. I could get, for instance,
> > charles@charles.oldfield.name, or whatever I set up. Might
> be somewhat
> > redundant, but it works.
> >
> > Charles Oldfield
> >
> >
> > At 08:56 PM 6/11/2002 -0700, Bryan Waters wrote:
> > >I have repeated requests to upgrade the .NAME packages for those
> > individuals
> > >who did not buy the e-mail bundle originally. Surely this is
> > >something
> > that
> > >will be available sometime???! We can't just say you can
> never have
> > >your .NAME forwarded if you didn't buy it up front...?!?
> > >
> > >-bryanw
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:18 EDT