I'm with Mark. Mostly because it means I don't have to put forth any extra
effort.
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Product Manager
Tucows Inc. - chuck@tucows.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
> [mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org]On Behalf Of Mark Jeftovic
> Sent: June 28, 2002 9:38 AM
> To: Charles Daminato
> Cc: Paul Chvostek; discuss-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: Re: META: Reply-To on discuss-list
>
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Charles Daminato wrote:
>
> > We've held back making any significant modifications to the list since
> > (for a long time now it seems) we've been in the works to move
> the list to
> > a different program (we're going to use Lyris - once we get a couple
> > glitches out).
> >
> > I'll see if I can't make a change shortly
> >
>
>
> Using "Reply-to" can set off a deep rooted theological debate.
> See "Reply-to Considered Harmful" at
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> or possibly "Reply-to Considered Useful" at
>
> http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
>
> and gentlemen start your engines....
>
>
> -mark
>
>
> > Charles Daminato
> > TUCOWS Product Manager
> > chuck@tucows.com
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Paul Chvostek wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This list tends to have *discussions*, and when you're early on in a
> > > chain of Group Replies, the duplicates are annoying. Given the nature
> > > of this list, is there an official reason why Tucows' list software
> > > doesn't add a Reply-To pointing back to the list?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Paul Chvostek
> <paul@it.ca>
> > > Operations / Abuse / Whatever +1
> 416 598-0000
> > > it.canada - hosting and development
http://www.it.ca/
> >
> >
>
-- mark jeftovic http://www.easydns.com http://mark.jeftovic.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:18 EDT