We try to handle all the abuse mail and postmaster mail that comes in (for all
of our company owned domains). I wasn't aware of a problem with bouncing, and
am currently investigating this (as well as working on getting us removed from
the Spamcop list yet again).
Thanks for the heads up all.
Robert L Mathews wrote:
>
> At 12/1/02 8:28 AM, Paul Gordon wrote:
>
> >
> >Received a bounce for a renewal reminder email from openSRS to a client who
> >obviously is running SpamCop on their server...
> >
> >>>>> MAIL From:<12683682.0.30Nov2002215728@mp.opensrs.net>
> >><<< 550 Mail from 216.40.33.45 refused by blackhole site bl.spamcop.net
> >
> >Someone care to bitch-slap Spamcop?
>
> The problem is not SpamCop per se, but one or more idiot SpamCop users
> who are reporting their domain expiration notices as spam:
>
> http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=216.40.33.45
>
> The solution for this is for OpenSRS to make sure they're receiving the
> SpamCop notices, then take the action described here:
>
> http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/167.html
>
> This will remove the idiot users from SpamCop, and the problem will go
> away.
>
> Someone at TUCOWS had better start reading, and handling, e-mail sent to
> abuse@tucows.com and postmaster@tucows.com. TUCOWS is also at fault here;
> this problem would not happen if that mail was properly handled.
>
> In particular, there is an entry in the SpamCop listing at:
>
> http://spamcop.net/sc?track=216.40.33.45
>
> ... that indicates that 137 of the last 273 messages SpamCop has sent to
> postmaster@tucows.com have bounced. (This is not a good sign for a
> company that aims to run a public e-mail service.)
>
> ------------------------------------
> Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies
-- Adrian Daminato Senior System Administrator, Tucows Inc.Chaos often breeds life, where order breeds habit. - Henry Adams
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:32 EDT