Re: Snapnames

From: Kirk Fletcher (kirk@webcity.com.au)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 00:01:02 EST


> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, at 13:44 [=GMT-0500], Pflege@aol.com wrote:
>
> > > Snapnames are useless,
>
> > A good alternativ as previously discussed seems to be namewinner.com.
> > But I do not have any experience with them up to now.

namewinner.com is an alternative, indeed. But "good" is being
a bit generous. The fact that you have to bid for the domain
almost defeats the purpose of placing a backorder in the first
place.

Snapnames has worked for us in tha past... I'd think very
carefully before supporting/participating in an auction though
(which is essentially what namewinner offers)...

Kirk

--
** Enetica Domains ** Accredited .au domain Registrar **
*** FREE domain name parking *** FREE URL forwarding ***
** http://www.enetica.com.au/ **** Domains for AUD$99 **



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:34 EDT