Excellent. I am taking the client and re-writing it into our Web
Application(basically our entire new site),
so the less I have to put from the reg_system the better :o)
I'll go through it and remove all aspects of the .ca in the reg_system.cgi.
Does the new one(ca_reg.cgi) support bulk registering .ca domains(I have not
yet looked to much through it)?
Thanks,
Richard.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Daminato" <chuck@tucows.com>
To: "POWERHOUSE" <powerhouse@servicenterprises.com>;
<discuss-list@opensrs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: .ca Domain Reg...
> We recommend the ca_reg.cgi for .ca purchases, but have left the existing
> .ca functionality in the current client code to allow resellers to
migrate.
> The ca_reg.cgi is a new component with improved (much!) .ca registration
> process flow and is the best to use.
>
> Shortly we'll be completely removing .ca from reg_system.cgi - and you can
> disable that as well.
>
> --
> Charles Daminato Life is not holding a good hand;
> OpenSRS Product Manager Life is playing a poor hand well.
> Tucows Inc. - chuck@tucows.com - Danish proverb
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
> > [mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org]On Behalf Of POWERHOUSE
> > Sent: January 14, 2003 4:05 PM
> > To: discuss-list@opensrs.org
> > Subject: .ca Domain Reg...
> >
> >
> > Why does the reg_system.cgi have .ca in the NEW release, plus have the
> > ca_reg.cgi?
> >
> > Can I remove all the .ca functions from the reg_system.cgi and
> > just use the
> > ca_reg.cgi?
> >
> > Or can I just ignore the ca_reg.cgi and just use the
> > reg_system.cgi for the
> > ca registrations?
> >
> >
> > Just trying to figure it out. the reg_system.cgi is a lot to parse, if I
> > have to leave all the .ca domain
> > stuff in it, PLUS have the other to use.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard.
> >
> >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:34 EDT