On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 21:26, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> True. But when a TLD is created for a purpose, that purpose should be
> excluded from .ORG. Hence, .NAME removes the need to put personal
> domains in .ORG, the existence of .COM means that a business entity
> should not be able to register in .NET or .ORG just because its .COM
> peer was taken, etc.
Entitled to your opinion, Roger, but fortunately yours is a vast
minority view. Regulation should not exist for regulations sake. I'm
with Ross on this one, under regulate.
I'd prefer if all TLDs were open, and that consumers made the choice
what namespace they wanted to be under. I see no compelling reason for
TLDs to have enforced charters.
-- domainwhiz@yahoo.com <domainwhiz@yahoo.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:37 EDT