Care to explain, besides the liability towards the customer, something
the registrar has in your case, what ground there would be to be sued
out of existence ? And isn't that a risk tucows/OpenSRS is running as
well ?
I am especially interested in this "violation of ICANN regs" since every
registrar in existence does what pleases them best anyway, despite
contracts with ICANN, ICANN states not to be the party to enforce, so
where does that lead in the end.
Abel
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
[mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org] On Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
Sent: 24 February 2003 04:19
To: ezgoing
Cc: I-Dotter.com OpenSRS-Discus; discuss-list@opensrs.net
Subject: Re: Back to OpenSRS I come
>>
>>SK> All I want to say - sometimes price isn't reason why peoples leave
>>SK> OpenSRS. There are other, much more important factors.
>>
Actually ez, all of this is a lot more straightforward than you make it
out to be. If you check out the policies portion of the website, you'll
note that resellers that have the registrant name them the technical
contact makes things a lot easier for themselves...without violating
ICANN regs and more importantly, without putting themselves on the line
liability wise. It won't be long before one of the registrars that
allows what you advocate in the manner that you advocate gets sued out
of existence.
-rwr
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:38 EDT