----- Original Message -----
From: "domainwhiz" <domainwhiz@yahoo.com>
To: "Technical Support" <support@xeotech.co.uk>
Cc: <discuss-list@opensrs.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2003 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose .." blah blah blah blah .... ;-)
Hi there Wiz,
> Was there anything at all salient in your message?
Now that depends whether you are able to read between lines... which
I'm not sure you can, or for that matter did.
> Maybe you don't understand that the alternative to independent competing
> deleted domain registration services is that Verisign runs the ENTIRE
> show on registering domains for a period of time after they are deleted.
On the contrary, I understand perfectly both the method, its execution, and its
madness. My objection is to 'automated deleted registration services' in their
entirety, and the poor intransigent philosophy that drives them.
> Ask yourself which you prefer, where anyone, including yourself, can
> develop a service to offer to the public in competing for these registrations
In answer to your rhetorical question, the answer is an emphatic neither. I
don't intend to develop such a service, nor do I see the reason or logic
behind using one. You are all just perpetuating the myth, and the problem
by doing so.
> and where the price point to the customer is subject to competitive market
> situations, or Verisign running it all, and there being no competitive pressures
> at all.
Sorry, there are other pressures that could be brought rather than jumping on
the jolly old bandwagon. like a lot of sheep. I, as it happens, do not belong
to genus Ovis; never have, and never will! ;-)
> Now maybe you understand the issue a bit more, as well as George's posts.
As previously stated, I do understand, but I don't agree. What is it you find so
difficult to comprehend here?
Regards,
Chris.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:43 EDT