Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation"

From: Bill Weinman (billw@webmonster.net)
Date: Sat May 10 2003 - 13:16:38 EDT

Next message: domainwhiz: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose .." blah blah blah blah .... ;-)"
Previous message: Technical Support: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose .." blah blah blah blah .... ;-)"
In reply to: George Kirikos: "GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
Next in thread: George Kirikos: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
Reply: George Kirikos: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
Reply: Paul Gordon: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 10:20 PM 5/9/2003, George Kirikos wrote:
>As a sign of what can happen in a free and competitive market, GoDaddy
>has innovated and come out with its own DomainAlert system, which
>attempts to acquire deleted domains on behalf of their clients. This
>creates yet another choice for consumers.

Choice for consumers or choice for squatters? I don't see how either
position (Verisign/NSI or GoDaddy) benefits consumers. They're just
squabbling over conflicting positions in the squatter market.

You really want to see more "choice for consumers"? Get rid of the
squatters.

--Bill

->--
   Bill Weinman <http://bw.org/>
   Music Database <http://www.webmusicdb.com/>
   Music <http://music.bw.org/>
   Whois Client <http://whois.bw.org>
                                               ->-+

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:43 EDT