Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation"

• Next message: Paul Gordon: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Previous message: domainwhiz: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose .." blah blah blah blah .... ;-)"
• In reply to: Bill Weinman: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Next in thread: Technical Support: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Reply: Technical Support: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Reply: Adam Selene: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello,

--- Bill Weinman <billw@webmonster.net> wrote:
> Choice for consumers or choice for squatters? I don't see how
> either
> position (Verisign/NSI or GoDaddy) benefits consumers. They're just
> squabbling over conflicting positions in the squatter market.
>
> You really want to see more "choice for consumers"? Get rid of
> the
> squatters.

Who determines who is an inappropriate registrant or "squatter"?
Picking a random domain, let's say BEAUTIFUL.COM, currently registered
to Proctor and Gamble, and not resolving to a website (although,
domains can certainly be used for more than just websites). What makes
their registration of this domain objectionable, if anything at all??

In the art market, some folks choose to display their pieces in public
galleries, others in their homes, and others keep them in locked
vaults. Are they doing something objectionable?

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/

• Next message: Paul Gordon: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Previous message: domainwhiz: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose .." blah blah blah blah .... ;-)"
• In reply to: Bill Weinman: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Next in thread: Technical Support: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Reply: Technical Support: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Reply: Adam Selene: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:43 EDT