Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation"

• Next message: Loren Stocker: "Re: [Re: GoDaddy:"
• Previous message: George Kirikos: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• In reply to: Bill Weinman: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Saturday, May 10, 2003, at 12:16 PM, Bill Weinman wrote:

> At 10:20 PM 5/9/2003, George Kirikos wrote:
>> As a sign of what can happen in a free and competitive market, GoDaddy
>> has innovated and come out with its own DomainAlert system, which
>> attempts to acquire deleted domains on behalf of their clients. This
>> creates yet another choice for consumers.
>
> Choice for consumers or choice for squatters? I don't see how
> either position (Verisign/NSI or GoDaddy) benefits consumers. They're
> just squabbling over conflicting positions in the squatter market.
>
> You really want to see more "choice for consumers"? Get rid of the
> squatters.
>

Like Proctor & Gamble, you mean?

Or who exactly?

• Next message: Loren Stocker: "Re: [Re: GoDaddy:"
• Previous message: George Kirikos: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• In reply to: Bill Weinman: "Re: GoDaddy: "We adamantly oppose the WLS as proposed and intend to use any means available to block its implementation""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:43 EDT