Re: [Re: GoDaddy:

From: Loren Stocker (loren@800.net)
Date: Sat May 10 2003 - 19:00:12 EDT


Bill,

How do you get rid of squatters??!! Rather that dreaming, why not do something
useful? Empower consumers to compete with squatters!

Not just ONE consumer by embracing this self-serving abuse of power -- the
Verisign MonopoLIST* (i.e. WLS) -- but empower ALL consumers who want a fair
opportunity to compete. There should be dozens of services like Go Daddy to
help consumers get a fair crack at dropping domains. If you've been around a
while you'll know that these services can BEAT all but the most determined
squatters (who now use the service themselves)!

Hey, if you really, really want a domain -- buy it! What we are talking about
here is consumers who all want a fair shot dropping domains. And our right to
compete should not be foreclosed by Verisign -- at any fee. That's what Go
Daddy, Dotster, and others are fighting for. Bravo!

Best, Loren
www.Evil.biz!

*Coined here today! Anybody like this term?

Bill Weinman <billw@webmonster.net> wrote:
At 10:20 PM 5/9/2003, George Kirikos wrote:
>As a sign of what can happen in a free and competitive market, GoDaddy
>has innovated and come out with its own DomainAlert system, which
>attempts to acquire deleted domains on behalf of their clients. This
>creates yet another choice for consumers.

    Choice for consumers or choice for squatters? I don't see how either
position (Verisign/NSI or GoDaddy) benefits consumers. They're just
squabbling over conflicting positions in the squatter market.

    You really want to see more "choice for consumers"? Get rid of the
squatters.

--Bill

->--
   Bill Weinman <http://bw.org/>
   Music Database <http://www.webmusicdb.com/>
   Music <http://music.bw.org/>
   Whois Client <http://whois.bw.org>
                                               ->-+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:43 EDT