domainwhiz wrote:
>
>Again, presupposing that they should be given higher priority.
>
>
Which I do.
>There is nothing inherent in trademark protection that gives them ANY
>such priority, nor should there be. They have VASTLY more protection
>under the law than they should have already, and you want to expand the
>protections to include even more supralegal protections than ICANN
>already gives them.
>
>
With which I disagree.
>
>(Mr Klorese has made his socialistic anti-free market views
>plain on this list in the past, and has made it clear that anything that
>benefits the free-market on the internet is bad in his opinion).
>
Anything that benefits the wild-west freedom folks like you advocate is
bad in my opinion, yes.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:43 EDT