> If domains are only "worth" what they cost to register, then
> marks are
> only "worth" what they cost to register.
>
> Can't have it both ways, buddy.
>
> You're getting "value" and "cost" muddled.
No, actually, I'm not.
I don't believe there is ongoing worth to "sex.com" vs.
"gooblefootzer.com". That age is over.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:43 EDT