At 6/6/03 11:52 AM, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>Is this not one of the more ridiculous things to come out of a registry
>in the past few years or have I missed something?
>
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc13/msg00012.html
It's an odd message, but the generic problem they are alluding to is real.
The owner of a .info domain name complained to us that when he tried
entering his "something@example.info" address on a couple of different
major e-commerce sites, the address was rejected. I forget the names of
the sites involved, unfortunately, but testing indicated these sites were
validating addresses using regexps that rejected any TLD that was not two
or three characters in length. This was more than a year after .info was
introduced.
Nothing we can do about it, of course, but I had to calm down a customer
who thought we had sold him an "invalid e-mail address". Sigh....
-- Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:44 EDT