I am curious. For those of us who have had "associations" with
register,com, does this mean we had a written contract, clearly spelling
out obligations and responsibilities on both sides, or were these
"associations" loose arrangements on a buyer beware basis, like
transactions at a flea market.
Mark Petersen wrote:
>I can only speak for myself, but my business will definitely go
>elsewhere. That's guaranteed.
>We've been associated with Register.Com in the past. After watching them
>blatantly steal away about 50% of our client base at renewal time, I
>vowed never to associate with them again. Without question, they are the
>most ethically challenged business we've ever dealt with. I would urge
>all of you to do your homework, and really consider your moves carefully
>if this does happen.
>Regards,
>Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org
>[mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org] On Behalf Of Oscar Petoskey
>Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 9:29 AM
>To: discuss-list@opensrs.org
>Subject: Re: If Register.com is buying Tucows....
>
>
>Ditto...
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 8/29/2003 at 3:31 PM Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
>
>
>>George Kirikos wrote on Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:56:03 -0700 (PDT):
>>
>>
>>
>>>If Register.com is buying Tucows
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>They will possibly lose a lot of customers ...
>>
>>
>>Kai
>>
>>--
>>
>>Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
>>Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
>>IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:46 EDT