hmmm.... Would somebody, preferably a Verisign representative, please
attempt to explain again how this new service from Verisign does not
detrimentally affect the stability of the Internet?
I mean, we now have administrators of DNS servers everywhere putting
whatever they think is appropriate into their configuration and/or zone
files, in reaction to Verisign's action....
John Vogel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
To: "Adam Selene" <nospam@vguild.com>
Cc: <discuss-list@opensrs.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Block Verisign's domain
>
> It would also seem perfectly appropriate to provide a
non-authoritative
> response for that record as well. New standards are being set, no
reason
> why we all shouldn't follow suit.
>
> Not that I'm advocating anything specific or anything, but it does
> logically follow that if the gTLD zone is serving non-authoritative
data
> for say, "opensrssss.net" then there's nothing other than convention
> standing in the way of other DNS operators to further monkey with
> authoritative responses.
>
> --
>
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:47 EDT