Re: ICANN insists VeriSign disables Site Finder

From: steve@seasoned-software.com
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 11:48:12 EDT


ALSO, they AREN'T serious! They are making it clear that they WANT this
to continue, and are working towards it! ALSO, "sitefinder" is *****STILL*****
up! WHY??????

Steve

>-- Original Message --
>Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 07:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
>From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: ICANN insists VeriSign disables Site Finder
>To: jwoods@tucows.com, discuss-list@opensrs.org
>
>
>Hello,
>
>--- jwoods@tucows.com wrote:
>> Good news folks...three cheers for ICANN ;)
>>
>> http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-03oct03.htm
>
>I wouldn't be cheering for ICANN, as they:
>
>1. Should have made this statement on Day 1, or better yet,
>PRE-EMPTIVELY, as they had been warned about SiteFinder's impending
>launch before it happened (and had also seen the .biz example of
>Wildcarding). This shows the continuing failure of ICANN, and its
>impotence. This failure is evident in the WLS process, too, and should
>be corrected there.
>
>2. Did not go far enough, in insisting that VeriSign return all audited
>GROSS revenues (that would include Overture's share, Paxfire's share,
>VeriSign's share, and any other partners we don't know about) related
>to SiteFinder. Hopefully this is an oversight that will be corrected
>soon. It was point (d) of the petition at:
>
> http://www.whois.sc/verisign-dns/
>
>Sincerely,
>
>George Kirikos
>http://www.kirikos.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:49 EDT