SiteFinder a trademark violation?

From: Adam Selene (nospam@vguild.com)
Date: Thu Oct 09 2003 - 18:58:03 EDT

Next message: Jeremy Kinsey: "Re: Two Name Servers required?"
Previous message: Adam Selene: "Two Name Servers required?"
In reply to: Roger B.A. Klorese: "RE: Sitefinder fallout: Day the music died at MP3.com"
Next in thread: Kai Schaetzl: "Re: Sitefinder fallout: Day the music died at MP3.com"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Btw, does anyone else find this funny?

SiteFinder.com - powered by SearchStation

   Domain Name: SITEFINDER.COM
   Registrar: ENOM, INC.
   Whois Server: whois.enom.com
   Referral URL: http://www.enom.com
   Name Server: NS.SEARCHSTATION.COM
   Name Server: NS2.SEARCHSTATION.COM
   Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
   Updated Date: 01-aug-2003
   Creation Date: 30-aug-2001
   Expiration Date: 30-aug-2004

Reminds me when Digital created the AltaVista search
engine at altavista.digital.com, and then later tried to sue
altavista.com for their domain name.

Adam

Next message: Jeremy Kinsey: "Re: Two Name Servers required?"
Previous message: Adam Selene: "Two Name Servers required?"
In reply to: Roger B.A. Klorese: "RE: Sitefinder fallout: Day the music died at MP3.com"
Next in thread: Kai Schaetzl: "Re: Sitefinder fallout: Day the music died at MP3.com"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:49 EDT